The Importance of Trade Validation
October 28, 2009
By Chris Morse
A trading system can be a wonderful tool when it comes to catching
moves in the markets. There are many trading systems available
to traders. Some methods focus on day trading while others will
focus on trend trading. Many systems take an approach to a specific
market or sector while other systems can watch many different
markets across the board. If you are a trader and looking to profit
consistently from movements in the markets you will need at minimum
a disciplined trading approach and a way to identify which markets
to trade, whether you are looking to position or day trade, a
method for deciding when and where to enter a trade, a method
for deciding when and where to exit a trade, and whether you want
to go long or short the market.
How does one best go about selecting a trading method or system?
It is important to find an approach to the markets that has been
validated and tested. You want to be able to confirm real-time
trading results along with longevity of the trading method. Too
many trading systems come and go every year. Most systems or methods
look great on paper and in testing (whether this is your own conception
or someone else's) only to find out they don't work as prescribed
in the real world.
The bottom line is a trading system or method must be validated
to trade it with any confidence. How do you validate a trading
system? You will want to see actual trading system results, entry
points, exit points and trade by trade results going back as far
as the system inception. Note: If a trading system has been adjusted
or modified, I suggest that the system is only valid to the time
of the modification. So, if a system has been around for 10 years,
but has made changes along the way, the system is only good to
its most recent change. It is also nice to see how a system has
performed in times previous to its inception. You can use back
testing to validate a trading method as far back as data will
allow. I personally test my systems 25 years back! If you develop
a trading system that looks great going back 1, 2 or 3 years and
the systems can't hold up in the prior years, then you probably
do not have a system that will hold up in the future. A system
must be able to withstand the test of time.
To get true system validation you will want to investigate several
aspects of the system. First, when was the system originally developed
and have there been any changes, if there have been any changes
you will want to be able to see a side by side comparison of the
system pre and post change (if the system before the change is
no longer working then how can you expect the system to work after
the change). Second, you will need to see equity curves for the
system since inception and preferably as far back in testing as
possible (I can take my systems back 25 years or more). Third,
you need to verify past trade by trade results, this means that
if the system follows X number of markets then you will want to
see the results (or at least have access to the results) for all
of the markets, not just the ones that are doing well at that
time. Fourth, when a system follows multiple markets you will
want to be able to see portfolio reports on the entire system
(basically the sum of all of the markets being traded). And if
you really want proof that a system is as depicted, look to see
if there are multiple sources of portfolio performance results.
A developer should be able to show you results on his proprietary
platform, TradeStation, Excel and 3rd party portfolio validation
testing programs such as Rina Systems or Portfolio Merge. All
this data is available to the developer if he is legit. Note:
Though all of this data is available to developers and individuals
creating and using trading systems, it can be time consuming to
put together this information for review. As a professional courtesy,
please only inquire for information request from anyone if you
have a sincere interest in using their trading methods (this means
purchasing) and not for just curious research. Don't take the
developers word for it! Any developer with his salt will also
have clients and brokers that he/she has worked with for years
and years. If the system is as claimed, then someone will undoubtedly
still be working with the system whether it is a client, a broker
or both.
I will show you what I mean by system validation. Here is a system
I developed nearly eight years ago. The system has never had a
change and can be back tested to twenty-five plus years with great
success. The portfolio below follows ten diversified markets.
Currently the system is in 6 trades out of 10. Here is every trade
(winners and losers). The charts are from TradeStation to prove
and validate the trading system signals are legitimate.
THINK MT Open Positions: $24,962.50

Copper - Most recent entry on 10/21 for $300.00 profit.

Dollar Index - Most recent entry on 7/15 for $3,620.00 profit.

Euro Currency - Most recent entry on 5/20 for $14,412.50 profit.
London Gas Oil - Most recent entry on 10/12 for $4,150.00 profit.

Palladium - Most recent entry on 10/06 for $2,455.00 profit.

Soybeans - Most recent entry on 10/12 for $25 profit.

As a trader and developer I cannot emphasize enough the importance
of validating trades and trading signals for a trading system.
If something looks good on paper, please don't hesitate to do
you due diligence on the trading system or method. Trading system
validation is just as important whether it is a system you developed
from scratch or if you are an investor and are investigating the
merits of purchasing a trading system.
About the Author
Chris Morse is the Developer of the TradeThink
trading system. He has been involved in the development of trading
strategies for nearly ten years. Mr. Morse developed a very robust
system which is now in private use at one of the largest FCM's
and has earned sizable returns for the last 3 years. Mr. Morse
now focuses his time exclusively on developing and managing his
systems.
Futures trading is not suitable for everyone and past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results